<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dark Art of the Plot Token</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghostwoods.com/2009/09/the-dark-art-of-the-plot-token-584/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghostwoods.com/2009/09/the-dark-art-of-the-plot-token-584/</link>
	<description>Something beautiful and strange is hiding in the dark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:48:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.ghostwoods.com/2009/09/the-dark-art-of-the-plot-token-584/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwoods.com/?p=584#comment-839</guid>
		<description>pulp fiction was a great movie!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pulp fiction was a great movie!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwoods</title>
		<link>http://www.ghostwoods.com/2009/09/the-dark-art-of-the-plot-token-584/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostwoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwoods.com/?p=584#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I remember that :) I did enjoy Ghost Ship, broadly speaking, but it was certainly unsubtle!

Of course, that&#039;s the problem with Chekhov&#039;s Gun -- it&#039;s often a case of damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t. There&#039;s a fine tightrope to walk over the twin pits of the Gun and Deus Ex Machina. In general, it seems that being hacky with Chekhov&#039;s Gun is more acceptable than erring the other way...

God forbid writers would actually try to think about such things and introduce them gracefully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I remember that :) I did enjoy Ghost Ship, broadly speaking, but it was certainly unsubtle!</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s the problem with Chekhov&#8217;s Gun &#8212; it&#8217;s often a case of damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t. There&#8217;s a fine tightrope to walk over the twin pits of the Gun and Deus Ex Machina. In general, it seems that being hacky with Chekhov&#8217;s Gun is more acceptable than erring the other way&#8230;</p>
<p>God forbid writers would actually try to think about such things and introduce them gracefully!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBishop</title>
		<link>http://www.ghostwoods.com/2009/09/the-dark-art-of-the-plot-token-584/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>JBishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghostwoods.com/?p=584#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall pointing out to you a few years back the Chekhov&#039;s Gun in the movie Ghost Ship - in an early scene we see a meat hook hanging in (IIRC) a ball room in the aftermath of some massacre the cast happens upon. Sure enough, come act IV, someone&#039;s hanging from it.  I knew the quote, but not who originated it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall pointing out to you a few years back the Chekhov&#8217;s Gun in the movie Ghost Ship &#8211; in an early scene we see a meat hook hanging in (IIRC) a ball room in the aftermath of some massacre the cast happens upon. Sure enough, come act IV, someone&#8217;s hanging from it.  I knew the quote, but not who originated it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

